Trusts vs LTCs vs Companies – Determining the Best Structure for New Zealand Property Investment

Choose the right ownership structure and save thousands in tax while protecting your assets. Our comprehensive guide reveals which structure works best for your property investment strategy so you can minimise costs and maximise your investment returns.

Trusts vs LTCs vs Companies for Property Structure NZ

Updated 29 August 2025

Summary

Choosing the wrong structure for your rental property could cost you tens of thousands of dollars in unnecessary tax and expose your personal assets to risk. Yet most property investors pick a structure based on what their relative or friend did, or worse, do nothing and hold everything in their personal name.
The reality is there's no one-size-fits-all answer. A negatively geared property bleeding $10,000 every year (which requires the owners to put money into paying the mortgage costs that the rents won't cover) needs a completely different structure than a positively geared property generating $20,000 profit.
Get it wrong and you're either leaving money on the table or creating expensive problems for later. Yet, many New Zealand property investors follow this 'DIY' model and don't maximise their investment returns.
The government makes it clear on their business.govt.nz website - "Getting a tax agent or accountant to complete your return may end up saving you money", and we agree with that and see the importance of professional guidance for structures. That's why we have worked with Lighthouse Accounting who have reviewed our information in detail.

This guide cuts through the complexity to explain exactly how Trusts, Look-Through Companies (LTCs) and standard Companies work for property investment. We explain real numbers, tax implications and practical considerations that determine which structure suits your situation. Our guide covers:

Important: Our guide is published to help you avoid the costly mistake of restructuring later, which can trigger tax bills and legal fees that dwarf any benefits you hoped to achieve. The structure you choose today affects not just your current tax position, but your ability to leverage equity, protect assets, and pass wealth to the next generation. Getting it right from the start is crucial.

Disclaimer: This guide is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute tax, financial, accounting, or legal advice. The information is based on general principles and may not apply to your specific circumstances. Tax laws, regulations, and their interpretations are complex and subject to change.

We strongly recommend consulting a qualified accountant, tax advisor, or lawyer to obtain tailored advice before making any decisions regarding property investment structures or tax obligations. MoneyHub and its contributors are not liable for any actions taken based on the information provided in this guide.

Our definitive guide to Trusts vs LTCs vs Companies is supported by our friends at Lighthouse Accounting

When choosing between trusts, LTCs, and standard companies for your property investments, the wrong decision can cost tens of thousands in unnecessary tax or create expensive restructuring problems later.

Lighthouse Accounting specialises in helping property investors structure their portfolios for maximum tax efficiency and asset protection.

What sets Lighthouse apart is their deep understanding of how different structures impact both your immediate tax position and long-term wealth strategy. Rather than taking a one-size-fits-all approach, they analyse your specific situation – your income levels, property portfolio, risk profile, and plans – to recommend the optimal structure.

Lighthouse's Accountants are particularly skilled at:

Structure analysis – modelling tax outcomes under trusts, LTCs, and companies to identify which saves you the most
Loss utilisation strategies – ensuring negative gearing benefits aren't trapped in the wrong structure
Asset protection planning – balancing tax efficiency with protecting your wealth from business and relationship risks
Restructuring guidance – minimising tax consequences if you need to change structures as your portfolio grows
Multi-entity coordination – optimising when you need different structures for different properties

If you're serious about maximising your property investment returns through smart structuring, a conversation with Lighthouse costs nothing but could save you significantly. Contact Lighthouse for Your Property Structure Assessment.

Important: While Lighthouse Accounting supports our guide, all information in this guide is presented independently and factually. We recommend speaking to a professional about your specific situation.

Contact Lighthouse Accounting

Understanding the Four Property Investment Structure Options – And How to Decide What's Right for You

Before diving into specific structures, understand this fundamental principle - how you own your property determines how profits are taxed, how losses can be used, and how protected your assets are.

The Three Key Factors in Structure Selection:

Tax Treatment
ach structure handles rental profits and losses differently. Some let you offset losses against your salary (reducing your tax bill), while others trap losses where they can't be used. This matters enormously - a $10,000 rental loss could save you up to $3,900 in tax if structured correctly, or save you nothing if structured poorly.
Asset Protection
Your structure determines whether creditors, relationship property claims (unless contracted out with a pre-nup, or legal challenges can touch your investment properties. Some structures create bulletproof walls, others offer tissue-paper protection.

This becomes critical if you're a business owner and/or going through relationship changes. Investment property can become a stressful ongoing hassle, which can, in itself, cause relationship issues. This means making sure you have everything sorted up front is critical to protect a long-term property investment.
Flexibility and Cost
Simple structures cost less to establish and maintain but offer limited flexibility. Complex structures provide more options but come with higher compliance costs. Annual running costs range from zero (personal ownership) to $3,000+ (complex trust structures).

With these three factors in mind, we outline the four options in detail below to help you evaluate what is best for your current and likely future situation.

Option 1: Personal Ownership - The Default Position

Most New Zealanders start here - buying rental properties in their own name or jointly with a partner. It's simple, cheap, and requires no special structures. This means there's no limited liability company.

Tax Impact: All rental income adds to your personal income. If you earn $80,000 and your rental makes $10,000 profit, you're taxed on $90,000. But if your rental loses $10,000, your taxable income drops to $70,000 - saving you $3,300 in tax at the 33% rate.

Protection: There is none - everything you own is exposed with 'unlimited liability' as outlined in this guide. If your business fails, you're chased for the debts, and/or your relationship ends, your rental properties are fair game for property relationship claims, unless you've got a valid pre-nup (known as a contracting-out agreement) in place.

When personal ownership can work:

You have a single property losing money (negative gearing)
You earn a high personal income (maximises tax benefit from losses)
You have a stable relationship with no concerns about separation
You plan to sell the property within 2-3 years (which will avoid restructuring costs)

When it doesn't work as well:

You own multiple properties (which means an accumulated risk exposure)
You own a business that doesn't have the protection of limited liability, for example, a sole trader or partnership (business debts could claim properties)
You are in a second relationship with children from previous relationships (which often creates estate complications)
Your properties are becoming significantly profitable (pushing you into higher tax brackets)

Option 2: Look-Through Companies (LTCs) - The Tax-Efficient Option

An LTC is a special type of company where profits and losses "look through" to shareholders based on their ownership percentage. It's best thought of as a tax-transparent wrapper around your property.

How LTCs Actually Work
Unlike standard companies, LTCs don't pay tax themselves. Instead, rental profits or losses flow directly to shareholders who include them in their personal tax returns. How this works is best explained by an example:

Sarah (surgeon, $300,000 annual income) and James (part-time teacher, $60,000 annual income) buy a $700,000 rental property. Year one shows a $20,000 loss after interest and expenses.

Scenario 1 – Personal ownership (50/50):

Each claims $10,000 loss
Sarah saves $3,900 in taxes (39% rate)
James saves $3,000 in taxes (30% rate)
Total tax benefit: $6,900

Scenario 2 - LTC ownership (95% Sarah, 5% James):

Sarah claims $19,000 loss
James claims $1,000 loss
Sarah saves $7,410 tax
James saves $300 tax
Total tax benefit: $7,710
Extra savings: $810 per year

Understanding the Power of Loss Attribution
LTCs shine for negatively geared properties because you can strategically allocate shareholdings:

Year 1-3 (Property losing money): High earner owns 95%, maximising tax refunds
Year 4+ (Property profitable): Restructure to 50/50 or allocate more to the lower earner
Flexibility: Can change shareholdings annually based on tax positions

Typical numbers over time: $800,000 property with $600,000 mortgage at 6%:

Year 1-3: $15,000 annual loss (after interest, rates, insurance, maintenance)
High earner (39% rate) saves $5,850 annually = $17,550 total
Year 4+: Property breaks even, restructure ownership
This structure indicates that without LTC, losses are often trapped or poorly allocated

LTC Limitations and Must-Know Facts
1. "Look-through" means everything flows through
While the LTC provides some separation, shareholders can still be personally liable for LTC obligations. If the LTC can't pay its debts, creditors can pursue shareholders for their proportionate share. This means that if your LTC-owned property has a $500,000 mortgage and you own 80%, you're essentially liable for $400,000 of that debt if things go wrong.

2. Compliance requirements cost real money
Examples of ongoing costs include:

- Annual financial statements if gross income exceeds $30,000: $800-1,200
R7 tax returns for the LTC: $400-600
Legal documentation for shareholding changes: $500-1,000 per change
Annual running costs: $1,500-2,500 typically

3. You cannot distribute tax-free capital gains
Unlike trusts, which can sometimes distribute capital gains tax-free to beneficiaries, any gains in an LTC immediately flow to shareholders. If you're caught by bright-line or other tax rules, you can't defer or manage the tax impact.

When LTCs Can Be Cost-Effective
They may be ideal for these scenarios:

Negatively geared properties: Losing $10,000+ annually in early years
High-income earners: Personal income over $100,000 wanting loss offsets
Unequal income partners: One earning $150,000, the other earning $60,000, etc
Medium-term holds: Planning to keep property 5-10 years
Active investors: Buying and improving properties regularly

A typical example: An insurance professional earning $280,000 buys two townhouses for $800,000 each. Total losses year one are $35,000, and the tax savings through LTC are $13,650. Without an LTC structure, the losses are trapped or inefficiently allocated.

LTCs will usually be unsuitable or the wrong choice altogether when:

The property is cash-flow positive from day one (here, a trust may be better)
Maximum asset protection is needed (a trust almost always provides more separation than an LTC)
There are complex family matters with multiple beneficiaries (a trust can offer more flexibility)
There is a passive long-term hold strategy (a company or trust structure can be simpler)

Option 3: Trusts - The Asset Protection Fortress

Trusts separate legal ownership from beneficial ownership. The trustees legally own the assets but must manage them for the beneficiaries' benefit. This separation creates powerful protection. Once properties are settled in a trust, they are no longer "yours" legally. This matters in several scenarios:

Business failure protection: You run a construction company that goes under owing $2 million, with personal guarantees and mortgages over your residential home. Your personal assets are exposed, but the family trust owning your rentals is untouchable (if properly structured years before problems arose).
Professional liability: If you're a professional and miss something that costs a client $500,000, they will start legal proceedings for the loss. Your house (owned personally) is at risk, but your rentals (in trust for 5+ years) are protected.
Relationship property claims: Your second marriage ends after 3 years - your new partner can claim half of relationship property, but cannot touch assets properly held in trust from before the relationship (though trust income during the relationship may be considered). Our guide to contracting out of the Relationship Property Act explains more.

Know This: Protection only works if the trust is genuine. If you treat trust assets as your own - paying personal expenses from trust accounts, living in trust property without paying rent, or making trust decisions solely for your benefit – the courts can declare it a "sham trust" with zero protection, and "bust the trust", which happens on a regular basis as this case outlines.

The Tax Reality of Trusts - Why Timing Matters
Trusts face a flat 39% tax rate on retained income, but can distribute income to beneficiaries at their personal tax rates. To best explain how this works, it's best to walk through a typical example:

Option 1 - Retain in trust:

Tax at 39% = $11,700
After-tax retained: $18,300

Option 2 - Distribute to beneficiaries:

Adult child at university (no income): Tax = $2,520
Spouse earning $45,000: Tax = $5,250
Working child earning $70,000: Tax = $9,900

Tax-efficient distribution example:

$10,000 to a university child: Tax $1,050
$10,000 to spouse: Tax $1,750
$10,000 retained: Tax $3,900
Total tax: $6,700 (vs $11,700 if all retained)
Annual savings: $5,000

The 39% trust rate makes strategic distributions even more valuable and reinforces why proper trust distribution planning is essential.

Important: Trusts can never distribute losses.
This makes the trust tax ineffective for negatively geared properties. For example:

You own a $700,000 property with $500,000 mortgage
The annual loss is $12,000 (interest exceeds rent)
If the property is held in personal name/LTC, you can save $3,960-4,680 in taxes annually. However, if it's in trust, you save $0 as losses are trapped until the property is profitable
This means that five years of losses add up to around $20,000+ in lost tax benefits.
Those trapped losses can offset future trust profits, but if you sell the property before it becomes profitable, the losses may be lost forever.

Trust Structures and Real Costs
We outline typical residential property trust structure costs and requirements to give you an idea of the costs involved.

Option 1 - Individual Trustees (cheaper but less flexible):

Minimum two trustees required
Names appear on property titles
Changing trustees means updating titles ($500+ each time)
Setup: $1,500-2,000
Annual costs: $1,200-1,500

Option 2 - Corporate Trustee (more expensive but superior):

The company acts as the sole trustee
Only the company's name is on the property title(s)
Change directors/shareholders without touching titles
Better independence for asset protection
Setup: $2,500-3,500 (including company formation)
Annual costs: $1,600-2,500

When Trusts Make Sense (and When They Don't)
Trusts Work Well For:

Profitable rental portfolios: If your properties generate positive cash flow, trusts offer tax flexibility through income distribution to beneficiaries at lower tax rates, plus asset protection. The more profitable your portfolio, the more valuable a trust becomes.
High-risk professions or business owners: Doctors, lawyers, company directors, builders, and anyone with personal liability exposure benefit from separating personal and investment assets. Properties held in trust for 5+ years before problems arise are generally protected from professional claims and business failures, but this is assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Complex family situations: Second marriages, blended families, or estranged children create relationship property and inheritance challenges. Trusts ensure properties go where you intend while protecting against unintended claims.
Long-term wealth preservation: If you're building a property portfolio to pass to the next generation, trusts provide continuity without probate, estate challenges, or forced sales when you die.

You May Considering Avoiding Trusts When:

You have negatively geared properties: Trusts cannot distribute losses to beneficiaries. A $12,000 annual loss on a rental property could save you $4,000+ in tax if owned personally, but saves nothing in a trust. Those losses remain trapped until the property becomes profitable or is sold.
You need maximum borrowing capacity: Banks often discount trust income and may require personal guarantees anyway, reducing your borrowing power. If you're still acquiring properties, personal ownership or an LTC might work better.
Your situation is simple: Single property, stable marriage, no business risks, modest wealth? The $2,000+ annual cost of maintaining a trust likely exceeds any benefits. Keep it simple with personal ownership or consider an LTC for flexibility.
You're investing short-term: Trust setup costs ($2,500-3,500) plus annual fees mean you need to hold properties for several years to break even. If you're planning to sell within 2-3 years, skip the trust.

The Bottom Line: Trusts are powerful tools for the right situation, but expensive overkill for simple property investments. Consider a trust when you have multiple properties, genuine asset protection needs, or complex family dynamics - not just because someone told you "everyone needs a trust."

Option 4: Standard Companies - The Business Structure for Property

Standard companies offer strong asset protection and a familiar structure, but come with significant tax limitations for property investment.

Company Tax Treatment - The Double-Edge Sword
Companies pay a flat 28% tax rate on all profits. This looks attractive when compared to personal rates going as high as 39%, but the reality is more complex. We explain how the imputation credit system works in the examples below.

The company makes $30,000 rental profit:

Company tax at 28%: $8,400
After-tax profit: $21,600
Distributed as a dividend with $8,400 imputation credits

Shareholder on 39% rate receives the $30,000 dividend:

Dividend income: $30,000 (including credits)
Tax at 39%: $11,700
Less imputation credits: $8,400
Extra tax to pay: $3,300
Total tax: $11,700 (same as personal ownership)

Shareholder on 17.5% rate receives the $30,000 dividend:

Tax at 17.5%: $5,250
Less imputation credits: $8,400
Refund: $3,150

Why Companies Aren't Always Optimal for Property Investment

Trapped losses can't help you: Your company-owned rental loses $15,000 in year one. You're personally paying 33% tax on your $100,000 salary. In a personal name or LTC, you'd save $4,950 in taxes. In a company, those losses sit trapped, useless until the company makes profits – this can take a long time with rental property, given all the current headwinds and risks.
Borrowing limitations: Banks often won't lend directly to companies for residential property. If they do, they'll require personal guarantees, defeating asset protection benefits and complicating lending.

When a Company Structure Might Work

Commercial property investment: Different lending rules, GST benefits, and business integration make companies more viable for commercial property.
Property development business: If you're regularly developing and selling, a company structure allows income smoothing and business expense deductions.
Integration with existing business: Your trading company has surplus cash. Using a related company to buy the business premises makes sense for tax and operational reasons.

Structure analysis – modelling tax outcomes under trusts, LTCs, and companies to identify which saves you the most
Loss utilisation strategies – ensuring negative gearing benefits aren't trapped in the wrong structure
Asset protection planning – balancing tax efficiency with protecting your wealth from business and relationship risks
Restructuring guidance – minimising tax consequences if you need to change structures as your portfolio grows
Multi-entity coordination – optimising when you need different structures for different properties

Contact Lighthouse Accounting

Making the Right Choice - Your Decision Framework

The right structure depends entirely on your financial position, investment timeline and risk profile. There's no universal answer – as our examples above illustrate, a negatively geared property needs different treatment than a profitable one, and your personal income level changes everything about tax efficiency.

Understanding Your Financial Position
Calculate these numbers before choosing any structure:

Step 1: Current Year Analysis

Work out your expected rental income after all expenses - mortgage interest, rates, insurance, maintenance, and property management - our dedicated deductions guide explains more
This net figure determines whether you're losing money (negative gearing) or making a profit. Your personal income and marginal tax rate then determine how valuable any losses are as tax deductions.
If you're on a $100,000 salary and your property loses $10,000, that loss could save you $3,300 in tax with the right structure. With the wrong structure, you save nothing.

Step 2: Five-Year Projection

Property investment is long-term. Map out when your property will likely become profitable - usually as rents rise and mortgage principal reduces.
Consider whether you'll buy more properties, whether your income will change significantly, and the realistic chance of selling - these factors fundamentally affect which structure works best.

Structure Comparison - Typical Numbers and Outcomes

Our table below explains the different options, what they cost every year to run, and how they can be tax-efficient based on different situations

Structure	Best Suited For	Tax Impact Example	Annual Costs
Personal Ownership	Single property, negative gearing, high personal income, stable situation, 2-3 year hold	$10,000 loss saves $3,300 tax (at 33% rate)	$0
Look-Through Company (LTC)	Multiple owners with different tax rates, negative gearing for 3+ years, building portfolio	$15,000 loss allocated 90% to 39% rate taxpayer saves $5,265	$1,500 to $2,500
Trust	Profitable properties, asset protection critical, complex family situations, 10+ year hold	$30,000 profit distributed to lower-rate beneficiaries saves $5,000 vs trust rate	$2,000 to $3,000
Company	Commercial property, development business, specific tax planning scenarios	Generally not recommended for residential rental - losses trapped, no capital gains benefits	$1,500 to $2,000

Understanding the Real (and Significant) Cost of Getting the Wrong Property Structure NZ

Understanding the Real (and Significant) Cost of Getting the Wrong Structure

Restructuring after you've bought a property isn't just expensive - it can trigger tax consequences that dwarf any benefits you hoped to achieve. We outline such costs below with typical scenarios to reinforce why getting it right from the start matters, should some of these situations become your reality.

1. Moving from Personal to Trust (After Problems Arise)

You've owned a rental personally for one year when your business runs into trouble. Now you want asset protection, but it's too late for clean restructuring.
Transferring to a trust triggers bright-line tax on any gains - potentially $30,000 on a property that's increased $100,000 in value. Add legal fees ($5,000), valuations ($1,500), and title transfers ($1,000), and you're looking at $37,500 in costs. Had you used a trust initially, the setup would have been $2,500.

2. Converting LTC to Trust (When Property Becomes Profitable)

Your LTC worked perfectly while the property was losing money, but now it's generating $20,000 annual profit.
Converting to a trust for income distribution triggers deemed disposal at market value, tax on depreciation recovery, and legal restructuring costs of $3,000+. Worse, those accumulated losses that could have offset future gains are potentially lost forever.

3. Trust to Personal (When You Need to Borrow)

Banks are unlikely to lend for your next property because the trust income doesn't count fully toward serviceability.
Transferring property out of the trust to personal ownership raises trust resettlement issues, permanently loses asset protection, and you can't reverse it without triggering tax.
This means you're stuck with a compromised position that limits both protection and growth.

Important: The scenarios above are real situations that cost New Zealand property investors thousands every year. The structure you choose today affects not just current taxes but your ability to leverage equity, protect assets, and build wealth over decades. Spending $1,500 on professional advice before buying could save you $50,000+ in restructuring costs later.

Working with Professionals – What You Need to Know

Property investment structures generally have to optimise the requirements of tax law, trust legislation, and lending limits that change regularly. While online guides (such as this MoneyHub example), property investment Facebook groups and Reddit boards provide useful context, there's no substitute for professional advice tailored to your specific situation. The wrong structure can cost tens of thousands in unnecessary tax or lost opportunities - far more than professional fees.

The challenge is knowing which professionals you need and when. Not every property purchase requires a team of advisors, but certain situations demand specialist expertise. A single rental property in your own name might only need a competent accountant at year-end.

However, a portfolio of properties across different entities, especially with asset protection concerns, requires coordinated advice from tax specialists, lawyers, and lending experts who understand property investment.

How much does it cost?

Professional fees range from a few hundred dollars for basic advice to several thousand for complex structuring.
While these costs feel significant upfront, consider them against the potential downsides - paying 39% tax instead of 17.5% on rental profits, losing properties in business failure or relationship breakdown, or discovering your structure prevents you from borrowing for the next opportunity.
The right advice at the right time typically saves multiples of its cost.

Choosing the Right Professionals

Not all accountants understand property investment, not all lawyers grasp trust structures, and not all mortgage brokers know how different entities affect lending.
You need specialists who work regularly with property investors and understand both the technical requirements and practical implications of different structures.
We outline what to look for and expect from each professional so you can make the right choice and work with someone who can ensure your property investment activities are optimised for tax efficiency and asset protection.

Option 1: Accountant ($100-$300+/hour)
Critical for tax optimisation and compliance. A good property-focused accountant saves multiples of their fee. They'll model different structures, project tax outcomes, and handle IRD correctly.
Questions to ask:

How many property investors do you advise?
Can you model my 5-year tax position under different structures?
What's your annual fee for ongoing compliance?
How do you handle trust distributions?

Option 2: Lawyer ($300 to $500+/hour)
Essential for structure establishment and property transfers. Don't use a conveyancing lawyer for complex structuring - you need a specialist.

What they should provide:

Structure recommendation letter
Risk analysis of options
Proper documentation
Asset protection assessment
Estate planning integration

Option 3: Mortgage Broker (usually free)
Different structures affect borrowing capacity dramatically. A broker who understands investment structures is invaluable.

The Bottom Line - Making Your Structure Decision

Property investment success requires the right structure as much as the right property. Poor structure choices can cost hundreds of thousands in unnecessary tax, expose your entire wealth to risk, or prevent you from growing your portfolio. Yet most investors spend more time choosing their couch than their ownership structure.

The optimal structure isn't about following formulas or copying others. It's about matching structure to your specific circumstances, goals, and timeline. After working with thousands of property investors, clear patterns emerge:

For most investors starting out: If you're buying your first rental with significant borrowing and have good personal income, an LTC often provides the best balance. You get tax benefits from losses, reasonable protection, and flexibility to restructure later.
For profitable portfolios: Once properties generate positive cash flow and you've built equity, transitioning to trust ownership usually makes sense. Yes, it costs $2,000+ annually, but the asset protection and tax distribution flexibility justify this for portfolios over $1 million.
For simple situations: One rental property, stable relationship, no business risks, planning to see how the property investment goes? Personal ownership keeps things simple and cheap. You can always restructure if your portfolio grows.
For complex needs: Multiple properties, business ownership, professional liability, or family complexity? Trust structures become essential, not optional. The setup might cost $5,000+, but protecting $2 million in property wealth justifies this many times over.

Warning: Default decisions - doing nothing and buying in personal names - might work out, but they might also cost you hundreds of thousands in tax or expose everything you own to risk. The structure you establish today determines whether your property wealth grows efficiently, stays protected, and passes to the next generation as intended.

Your future financial position depends on the decisions you make today. Choose your structure as carefully as you choose your properties, because while you can sell a bad property, unwinding a poor structure can be far more expensive and sometimes impossible without significant tax consequences. We receive regular emails from property investors asking about a structure problem that has arisen due to a lack of professional guidance upfront – it's never too late to seek advice and organise things to ensure long-term robustness.

Frequently Asked Questions

My marriage is rocky, and I want to protect my three rentals worth $2 million, which I owned before I got married - is it too late for a trust?

Yes - it's likely too late for meaningful protection. Courts look at the timing of asset transfers very carefully. Moving properties to a trust when relationship problems are evident can be reversed as a disposition to defeat relationship property claims - known as a "trust bust".

Even if the transfer stands, your spouse could claim you've reduced the relationship property pool and seek compensation. The reality is that asset protection through trusts needs to be established years before problems arise. Your best option now is to see a relationship property lawyer about a contracting-out agreement, though your spouse would need independent legal advice and genuinely agree to it.

Can I just change from personal ownership to LTC without triggering tax?

No - transferring property from personal to LTC ownership is a disposal for tax purposes, even though you still control it. If caught by bright-line rules (property owned less than 2 years), you'll pay tax on any capital gain. Even outside bright-line, you'll need to pay for a market valuation ($1,500), legal documentation ($2,000-$3,000), and title transfer ($1,000+).

However, there's a potential workaround - and while this is not financial or legal advice, you may want to consider becoming co-owners first (adding the LTC as a co-owner), then gradually increase the LTC's share over time. This requires careful structuring to avoid triggering tax. We suggest you consider getting professional advice before attempting it.

I earn $200,000, my spouse earns nothing - should we own our rental 50/50 or 100/0?

This depends entirely on whether the property is losing money or profitable:

If it's losing money, you want to consider 100% ownership to maximise tax deductions at your 39% rate.
By doing so, a $20,000 loss saves you $7,800 in tax versus only $3,900 if split 50/50. But once profitable, you want your spouse owning as much as possible - their first $14,000 of income is tax-free, next $34,000 at just 17.5%.
On a $30,000 profit, you'd pay $11,700 tax at 39%, they'd pay $7,950 at their lower rates - saving $3,750 annually.
The optimal strategy is likely to use an LTC and adjust ownership percentages as the property transitions from losses to profits.

The bank says they won't lend to my trust but will lend to me personally - what are my real options?

Banks are increasingly reluctant to lend to trusts, often requiring personal guarantees that defeat asset protection anyway.

You have four options:

First, buy in your personal name initially, then transfer to a trust once you have more equity (accepting the costs).
Second, use a hybrid structure where you own the property but grant a mortgage to your trust for protection.
Third, find a different bank - some are more trust-friendly than others.
Fourth, accept personal ownership for now but ensure other assets are protected.

Important: If you're personally guaranteeing trust borrowing, you're not getting true asset protection anyway.

My accountant suggests a company for my rentals because it's "only 28% tax" - why does this MoneyHub guide suggest otherwise?

Your accountant is technically correct but missing the full picture. Yes, companies pay 28% tax, but when you take money out as dividends, you pay again.

If you're on the 39% rate, you'll pay another 11% on top, making the total tax identical to personal ownership. Worse, companies trap losses - that $10,000 first-year loss saves nothing in a company, versus $3,900 in your personal name.

Companies can't distribute capital gains tax-free like trusts sometimes can. Banks often won't lend to companies for residential property. The only winners with company structures for residential rentals are usually those with very specific circumstances or commercial property. For 95% of residential property investors, companies are the wrong choice.

I'm getting divorced and have two rentals in an LTC - what happens to my tax losses?

LTC ownership follows shareholdings, so in divorce, shares are relationship property subject to a 50/50 split unless you have a contracting-out agreement.
Your accumulated losses belong to whoever owned the shares when losses arose. If you've been claiming 90% of losses for three years, those historic benefits stay with you.

In the future, if shares are split 50/50, future profits or losses will be split equally. The expensive problem: if properties are now profitable, your ex-spouse gets half the profits, but you claimed most of the losses.

You may want to consider negotiating to keep 100% of the LTC shares while compensating with other assets - this avoids ongoing financial entanglement.

My rental will be profitable immediately - why not just use personal ownership and keep it simple?

For immediately profitable properties, personal ownership is actually often the worst choice from a tax perspective. That $20,000 annual profit adds directly to your income - if you're already earning $70,000+, you're paying 33% or 39% tax.

A trust lets you distribute income to lower-rate beneficiaries (children at university, retired parents, lower-earning spouse), potentially saving $3,000-5,000 annually. While trusts usually cost $2,000+ yearly to maintain, tax savings can quickly exceed this. Plus, you get asset protection that could save your entire portfolio if your business fails or you're sued professionally. Overall, "simple isn't always smart" when it costs you thousands annually.

I have six properties, some losing money, some profitable - should I use different structures for each?

While theoretically optimal, multiple structures can create complexity and cost that usually outweigh benefits. Running three structures (personal for losses, trust for profits, LTC for flexibility) means three sets of accounts, three tax returns, complicated lending, and potential confusion.

A better approach is to use one flexible structure for all. An LTC works well for this - you can allocate losses to high earners and adjust shareholdings as properties become profitable.

Alternatively, if most properties are profitable and asset protection matters, put all in a trust and accept that some losses are trapped.

The exception is if you have one significantly different property (commercial versus residential, or development versus rental), a separate structure might make sense.

Structure analysis – modelling tax outcomes under trusts, LTCs, and companies to identify which saves you the most
Loss utilisation strategies – ensuring negative gearing benefits aren't trapped in the wrong structure
Asset protection planning – balancing tax efficiency with protecting your wealth from business and relationship risks
Restructuring guidance – minimising tax consequences if you need to change structures as your portfolio grows
Multi-entity coordination – optimising when you need different structures for different properties

Contact Lighthouse Accounting

Glossary of Terms

This guide is detailed to a level beyond the ‘standard’ MoneyHub resource. To help readers make better decisions, we include a glossary of terms we have used below.

Bright-line test: Tax rule requiring you to pay tax on property sales if sold within two years. The test aims to tax property speculation and varies based on whether the property is a new build, first home, or investment property. Getting caught by bright-line can mean a tax bill of 30-40% on your entire capital gain, making the timing of sales critical. Our guide to bright-line explains more.
Imputation credits: Tax credits attached to company dividends representing company tax already paid, preventing double taxation. When a company pays you a dividend from profits taxed at 28%, it attaches credits for that tax. If your personal rate is 39%, you only pay the additional 11% difference; if your rate is 17.5%, you get a refund of the excess credits.
Look-through company (LTC): A special company structure where profits and losses flow directly to shareholders' personal tax returns based on ownership percentages. Unlike regular companies, LTCs don't pay tax themselves - everything passes through to shareholders who can offset rental losses against other income. Shareholdings can be adjusted annually, making LTCs ideal for properties transitioning from losses to profits.
Negative gearing: When rental property expenses (mainly interest) exceed rental income, it creates a tax-deductible loss. A property with $30,000 rent but $40,000 in interest and expenses creates a $10,000 loss that can reduce your other taxable income. While losses are now ring-fenced for most investors, new builds and certain other properties remain exempt, allowing full loss deductibility.
Relationship property: Assets subject to equal sharing between spouses/partners under the Property (Relationships) Act, unless contracted out. After three years of living together (or less with children), your partner can claim half of the assets acquired during the relationship. This includes rental properties, even if only in your name, unless you have a valid contracting-out agreement (prenup) signed before purchase.
Residual income tax (RIT): The amount of tax you owe after deducting PAYE and other credits - determines provisional tax obligations. If your RIT exceeds $5,000, you become a provisional taxpayer and must pay tax in advance for the following year. For property investors, RIT typically comes from rental profits not covered by PAYE from employment.
Ring-fencing: This is a tax rule preventing rental losses from being offset against other income (though some exceptions exist). Introduced in 2019, ring-fencing means your $10,000 rental loss can only offset other rental income or be carried forward to future years. Exceptions include new builds, development properties, and certain mixed-use properties, making structure selection even more critical.
Sham trust: A trust where assets are still treated as personally owned, providing no legal protection. If you pay personal expenses from the trust, live in trust property rent-free, or ignore trustees when making decisions, courts can declare it a sham. When this happens, creditors can access "trust" assets as if you owned them personally, defeating all protection.
Tax-transparent: A structure where tax consequences pass through to owners rather than being taxed at the entity level. LTCs and partnerships are tax-transparent - they don't pay tax themselves but pass all income and losses to owners. This allows tax-efficient allocation of losses to high-income earners while maintaining some liability protection.
Trust distribution: The payment of trust income to beneficiaries, taxed at beneficiaries' personal rates rather than the trust rate. A trust earning $40,000 can distribute this to beneficiaries in low tax brackets rather than pay a 39% trust rate. Strategic distribution to university students, retired parents, or lower-earning spouses can save thousands annually, but distributions must be genuine and documented properly.

Related Resources: